Awards matching surveillance terms: 2 for the week of Oct. 12, against a median of 8 over 16 complete weeks
The count of federal awards whose descriptions match surveillance terms was 2 for the week of Oct. 12, 2026, against a median of 8 in each of the 16 earlier complete weeks.
These figures count money agencies committed to buy surveillance-related goods and services, so they show purchasing activity rather than whether any system was switched on or used on the public.
The measure is a weekly count of federal contract awards whose descriptions match surveillance terms, tallied Monday to Sunday. For the week of Oct. 12, 2026, the count was 2, against a median of 8 in each of the 16 earlier weeks. The count is complete through Oct. 24, 2026, with no posting lag seen. Figures come from USASpending.gov award records searched by keyword.
Both awards in the week went to Miami Tribal Systems Integrators, LLC. Award 70RFP426PE5000003, dated Oct. 14, 2026, is described as the "purchase and installation of a video surveillance system" at a federal building, with an obligated amount of $667,541.63.
The second, award 70RFP427FRE600001, dated Oct. 16, 2026, is described as a Federal Protective Service video surveillance system replacement at a U.S. courthouse, with an obligated amount of $452,583.32, also to Miami Tribal Systems Integrators, LLC.
The dollar figures are obligated amounts, meaning money committed under the awards, not money already paid out. They are not ceiling values: the potential total value an award could reach is a separate figure, and the amounts above are the obligations recorded for these two awards. An award is a purchase, not evidence that a system was deployed or used.
Records that would go beyond the award notices, such as installation reports, site inventories or usage logs, would come from the awarding agency through a FOIA request, which asks a federal agency for records it holds; FOIA.gov describes how to file one. The award descriptions and identifiers above are the documentary basis for this count.
Room for disagreement
Weekly counts in the 16 earlier weeks shown ranged from 3 to 22, so a single week at 2 is one reading and not a sustained level. The count also depends on how award descriptions are worded, since it matches keywords rather than a fixed category.
About the data
Every figure in this story is read from PostNewz's pn_records table (143 rows read Oct 24, 6:31 a.m. HST): Awards matching surveillance terms per week; the week of 2026-10-12 holds 2 against a median of 8 over 16 earlier complete weeks (pn_records; complete through 2026-10-24). Prose by Eva Lindqvist (pn98-pnj-v8.2, model @cf/deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017); numbers checked against the rows by the figure guard; neutrality check passed.
Sources
Corrections
- : Correction: The period the story counted was still incomplete when it was published, because this source's records arrive late. The correct week is the week of Oct. 12, with 2 awards, against a median of 8 over 16 earlier complete weeks. Corrected Oct. 24, 2026, 11:37 p.m. HST.
- : Correction: The period the story counted was still incomplete when it was published, because this source's records arrive late. The story initially reported awards for the week of Oct. 12 against an incomplete period. The correct comparison is against a median of 8 awards over 16 complete weeks. An earlier version of the headline read: “Awards matching surveillance terms: 2 for the week of Oct. 12, against a median of 8.” An earlier version of the summary read: “The count of federal awards whose descriptions match surveillance terms was 2 for the week of Oct. 12, 2026, against a median of 8 in each of the 16 earlier weeks.” Corrected Oct. 25, 2026, 1:36 p.m. HST.